torsdag den 20. januar 2011

My Vision of Battlefield 3

I'm Writing this to remove all my negativity from my original post.

BF3 should be evolution not devolution.




of cause beyond what I'm writing here, I would like the game to evolve in to something more than just what have been so don't get me wrong.

so here is a list of features I'd like to see most of them can be summed up with the previous games but it's not just that. like this:

in BF1942 the map size was Perfect in the large ones
so I'd like the map sizes of BF1942 to come back

in BFV the handling of choppers and planes was just simply Awesome. however I do believe it should change a bit just to be challenging.
in BF2 the modern warfare was cool and the commander and the way to organize squads was Awesome.

anyway a small list from most important to me in the top to least important in the bottom:



Better Updating system.
Large maps

prone
more than 64 players support
Many Vehicles and aircraft and large ships

better hit box
a Modding Eviroment
better knife

Better joystick support.
Better Teamplay.
NO DOG TAGS when beeing knifed.
no Hardcore/Softcore
the ability to host your own Ranked Servers
a good administrator environment for the servers
good handheld weapons balance.



this is just a small list without descriptions but I take it that they should give a positive idea instead of all the negativity I had in my last post. I guess my frustration over BC2 was showing too much. ;) 

mandag den 17. januar 2011

Battlefield 3 what I would like it to be like.

I know I haven't been posting much lately but I had my exams to worry about.
now this post is dedicated to BF3 and a hope that the game will blow our minds, thou it gets less and less likely with what they are releasing of information. however here is what I think as a minimum they should do to at least keep true to it's roots.


and I know we aren't all gonna agree on what I write. 

First of all a short list without explanation for a easy overview.

NOT a CONSOLE PORT!!!
Large Maps
64 or above players support
Prone
Large Ships and maps that have support for them.
Better joystick support.
Better Updating system.
Better Teamplay.
Better Knifeing option.
NO DOG TAGS when beeing knifed.

Hardcore/Softcore 
a Modding Eviroment
the ability to host your own Ranked Servers
a good administrator environment for the servers
good handheld weapons balance. 

okay I'll now take them one by one with Explanation.

NOT a CONSOLE PORT
well it's self explanatory however for the dense if they make a console port there will be a lot of possibilities missing in the end result simply because consoles can not physically support it, my suggestion to avoid this and at the same time to save time is to make the game for PC and afterwards Downsize it to console that way the console still get the game but the PC won't be affected by the consoles limitations.

Large Maps.
the maps of BFBC2 were Way to small for all out war it meant that the game play was limited and felt stuck at any point all the time. large maps will give the feeling of all out war and will also give the opportunity to outflank the enemy with much more complex tactics available than just frontal assaults. this will make the game successfully simply because the clans will develop tactics and keep true to the game because it will require a lot of teamwork to be successful.

64 or above players support
simply because if the player count is high the maps have to be of a certain size so it is sort of an extension of the above.

Prone
is needed if I want to go to cover. and just cause prone is in the game dolphin diving and bunny jumping can easily be avoided by programming in a short delay of when you can shoot when going to prone or when jumping. and don't come with the excuses you did to BFBC2 cause they were soaking of the hidden excuse :"cause this is a console port we can't change it"

Large Ships and maps that have support for them.-
Well to be honest I miss the BF1942 size maps and ships. simple as that. could be fun to have this in the new BF3

Better joystick support.
well this is self explanatory however for the ones that don't know. BFBC2 was so large a console port that the entire Joy stick was at best up to the player to mess around with to get it working and I'm talking settings files that we shouldn't mess with. and at worst not working at all.

Better Updating system.
well the updating system was actually Very good it just had one flaw and this flaw made it difficult for the programmers at dice to make too many updates without the updates becoming too large in size.

Better Teamplay.
what killed BFBC2 for me was how little Teamplay there was needed to win.
at least in BF2 there was a minimum of teamplay needed to win in BFBC2 a good player could achive victory for his entire team...

Better Knifeing option.
simply here because I did like how the knife was tied to a button. I just didn't like all the errors and auto aim and such.

NO DOG TAGS when beeing knifed.
I know a lot of people liked this, But this alone made a lot of conflicts in the clans I know please don't make it so in this BF3 game it doesn't make you anything but a bully to other players anyway.

I've just thought of another feature.

Hardcore/Softcore 

Don't want it cause the game should be in one mode only Hardcore and that's it so it's the same for everyone and so the community clans don't get divided to two factions which in the end just looses enough players so there won't be any real competitive play.

a Modding Eviroment
this is because the game will proloong it's lifetime and player support base if we can adjust and improve on the underlying game through modding.

the ability to host your own Ranked Servers
this is cause there are lots of clans out there and they don't all have the money to buy a rank server.

a good administrator environment for the servers
well again the only Real way to get the admins involved in running a server good is if they can set the server up just like they want it instead of risking loosing the attention of the admins because they don't really care when they can't set it up, they will then also get sluggish at actually banning or removing cheaters and suspicious persons.

good handheld weapons balance. 
with this I mean something like this.
Any handheld weapon makes a head shot = one shot kill
any powerful handheld weapon make a body shot= one to two shot kill
any less powerful handheld weapon make a body shot = two shot kill.
any sidearm make a body shot = 3-4 shot kill.
any powerful handheld weapon make a hit in the arm or leg. = two to three shot kill.
any less powerfull handheld weapon make a hit in arm or leg. = three to four shot kill.
any sidearm make a hit in arm or leg = four to five shot kill.
range should be 100-400 meters for iron sight depending on weapon type however the maps should be large enough for the scoped weapons to have an advantage on the 400-800 meters range and the large sniper rifles should have an advantage at 600-1500+ range. the + is because the most long range shot I've seen is actually at 2200 meters however it was with a special made sniper and bullet, another sniper at same range and larger caliber took 3 shots to hit. this way the snipers and the rifles work Well within their own range.
and now we are talkin weapons adjustable scopes wouldn't be that bad either 

tirsdag den 12. oktober 2010

Evaluation

I've now spend a few post on saying sort of why I dislike Steam. I think it's been me reacting on a game series of my favorits latest version have been released as a Steam only game.
So I needed to vent some air out somewhere, not only that it's been sort of a small discussion with myself Every time I was close to say I'm gonna use steam I came here and started writing down why I dislike Steam.

Now the conclusion is more that I'm most likely gonna give steam a second chance and get the game I like Who knows I might enjoy not Owning the game but playing it.

fredag den 1. oktober 2010

Steam Why it should be avoided.

Steam sucks Period.
I don’t want to run a program that needs to be on-line just for me to be able to play a off-line game,
I don’t want to make more connections to the INTERNET than absolutely needed.
I absolutely don’t wanna be forced to be on-line just to install a game.
I don’t want a game that I can’t resell when done with it or borrow to a friend so that he might get interested enough in the game to actually buy it from retail.
the rest will be quotes and links on other's opinions that I mostly agree with.

 this is quoted from a post on steam http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1152603

Hello to the ppl working at Steam ( idiots )

You might think I was a bit harsh with the topic name. But fear not. Here is the reason for it.

1. I buy a game to play.
2. my money. not yours
3. Lets say I have to go somewhere and there is no internett where I am. And I want to install my new game to play it. Hmmm see he problem here?
4. I buy the game, not a software so I can download a client of the game and not the game itself. I bought it, I have the dvd`s. I want it installed on my computer and play it when I want to, where I want to. And not be restricted to " oh you need an internett connection to be able to play the game " horse ♥♥♥♥!

I remember back in the days when you bought the game, punched in a cd-key and that was it.

Now it takes about 10 min to install the game (no problem there)
But it takes ♥♥♥♥ing 30-40 min to log into this crappy steam VAC system and it aint even working!!!! so now I am sitting here with a brand new game, that I cant play cause you at steam just had to ♥♥♥♥ it up with this bull ♥♥♥♥ program that has in fact NOTHING to do with the game or games what so ever to begin with!

Do your program help with the FPS? NO!
what about... does the game cost less? NO!
better grapfics? NO!
Do you pay ME money to have your program on my computer and taking up disk space on the hard-drive that I own? NO!
Does your system make the install and running of games any better and more easy, or give some added bonus besides the game? NO!

Soooooo... what then?
"oh we provide a service to the ppl out there and help copy right protection with our VAC system, so we stop pirates"

Ey...einsteins... wake up and smell the morning coffee would you please.. The dumb VAC system does not work at all. It takes me shorter amount of time to download a torrent or crack to bypass you VAC system and install it and make the game run, than to login and all the other crap I have to do with your system.

oh and news flash. I have several games that have the VAC system, and everyone is cracked. strangest part is... and I find it almost worth laughing about... the games now works better with the crack installed than to run it with steams VAC system... WELL DONE!!!

So in fact, its the ppl and I am one of them that gets punished for what the pirates do!! and I buy my games!!! WHF!!!! I buy the games and the games work worse than the pirated ones!!!
and the game designers are sitting and wondering why ppl are pirating like mad?? ITS BECAUSE IT WORKS BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL WITH ALL THE SECURITY BULL♥♥♥♥!!! hell you dont need to be a doctor to understand this!

I just want to play the dam game I bought, and I dont want to go through an security and valiation check like I was trying to break into a federal bank or something. whats next?? you need a sample of my blood to keep track of my dna? so you can be sure it is me?

Do me a favor. Make a patch that I can use when I am not online. So I can still install my game and play it.

Or better yet.. I hope and pray that someday someone makes a virus that will destroy steam and other programs like this.

cause steam imo is like a virus to games, and gamers. face it, the more bull♥♥♥♥ you force on with the game, the higher the risk for a crash, freeze, etc etc. so no wonder again a pirated version works better cause they removed the extra garbage that has nothing to do with the game.

So my new game is going back to the store and I will get myself the cracked one. Hell it will even work better + its free. Good luck finding a better bargin.

And I guess this post will be deleted cause poor steam dont like ppl talking bad about them...

Games Piracy

It's no wonder there is a higher piracy of games these day's, either the games are so bad that they aren't worth paying for, or they release their games on media's that just isn't allowing as much as gamers want. media's like Steam that limits the use of their software so much that you start to wonder if they actually wanna let people play their games, just maybe someone out there could get a great idea while playing their games, that would be bad for steam.

When I buy a game. it should be Hell of a good game.
I should be able to decide whether I wanna keep the game or sell it on to friends or let a friend borrow it for a little while once I'm done with it. thou When a game is good I keep it of cause.

Development companies talk so much about how piracy hurts their income and ability to make games for us.
Well instead they should start realizing that piracy would be minimal if they just followed a few Simple rules when making their games:

Don't Ever make a game for Steam. Period.
Don't release a game that isn't 99% perfect at release.
Don't screw over your customers by Changing Fundamental stuff.
if making a port from Any console Don't limit the PC version because the console version was limited.
And Never Ever remove something from a PC game that have been considered Standard in other games of similar types.
Make games with Play value.
If making games for on-line play, Make sure that the game is fairly balanced at release, with a minimal of bugs.

following those simple rules will minimize piracy to such an extent that most would buy the games because the game is worth the money.

Game developers these days are moving in the wrong direction when they are trying to protect their software, they are trying to do what the music industry have done for years. worst part is the music industry is loosing badly because of their policies, I would suggest the Game industry to look at the music industries and learn from their failures.

I would even go as far as saying that the more the games get protected towards piracy the higher the interest there is in piracy. make a few stuff that most CD/DVD/blueray's have these days renew them if needed. but don't start to use Steam because steams approach is one of the worst ways to try and prevent piracy it's so bad that games on steam usually are pirated and used by tons of people Each day and they have no intention of buying the game.

instead release the games in to piracy area's and see how people would Run to the companies to buy the game because they loved the game. thou this approach of cause requires the game to have a Great play value and not too many bugs. but it will be so many times better than the Steam approach.

I hate when the game industry and music industry is Whining about their money loss because of piracy, it's their own fault for not realizing that a game or a piece of music would bring in money from people that like it instead of forcing people to buy it and then they realize they didn't like it anyway. if a game or a piece of music is good then once it is tried or heard one time or a few times the people who like it would Gladly spend a lot of money on that particular game or music.

mandag den 27. september 2010

Just a Thought

being kind, friendly and helpful to others is perceived as someone to exploit.
being harsh, hostile and indifferent towards others is perceived as being evil.

be the first and be ready for everyone to exploit you.
be the second and be ready for everyone to hate you.

the middle road is even worse, then everyone hates you and exploits you.

Humans are most of the time both. so why do we use the phrase "to be humane" as a good thing. ?

torsdag den 16. september 2010

Why are there so many users for consoles

First off I've decided that I'd write in English from now on, to practice my written English.

I've seen over the past few years console have become Very popular gaming platform.

so today I'm reflecting a little upon that, Why have it become such a successful gaming platform when it is so inferior gaming platform compared to PC's

I think the reason is partially that people don't like to have so many choices that a computer offers it makes most people confused, and the fact that a console seems so much easier just pay a little for a console have a decent television, than to actually figure out what is needed to run the newer games on a computer.

And then there are the price aspect a computer is expensive in the beginning were consoles are expensive over time. I think most people look at the price tag on the computers and then at consoles and see that there are a huge difference in the purchase of both, they don't think that when it comes to games console games are more expensive on consoles so the console becomes expensive over time compared to that most pc games are quickly cheaper than console games.
and when a console gets outdated Then you are forced to buy a new console if you want to play the new games you can't just spend a little on upgrading your console like you can with your computer.

I will end todays blog with a link I found Very interesting in this subject it doesn't explain anything but it does show some differences and why it is mind blowing to me that there are so many there chooses to play on console rather than on PC.

http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/12-reasons-pc-gaming-is-better-than-consoles-485178